honestly? Id pay for it
honestly? Id pay for it
Ok, I got it now, thanks.
I briefly got you in my friends list, now you’ve removed yourself and I still have not gotten the invite…
rust mentioned, lets goo
He’s talking about principal shooting, you about production of the whole film.
Honestly, I’m kinda looking forward to the IPO - because it might be the last enshittification straw that breaks the camel’s neck that will finally drown reddit for what it has become.
It’s not that expensive to buy a premium static IP from ISPs. It’s like 10% on top of a usual monthly rate, so not a terribly expensive one.
a few years ago, I played sauerbraten a lot.
watch it you lazy mongrel
Man, I used to watch them years ago…are they still around?
yeah, yeah, romans and their dang numerals.
I love handcrafted world of skyrim. Escapist preview essentially mentioned that a lot of the starfield world is barren procedural-like planets. I would love an exploration game. I’m not sure I want a game with bazillion planets each of which has essentially same outpost (from design perspective). Granted, I might be wring, I keep watching reviews and opinions, but at this point, the game is not instabuy, more like wait for a sale - if it kept its hype.
The Escapist preview essentially confirmed my fears - I guess I’ll patiently wait for TES IV.
At some point, the same could have been said with win -> linux.
I mean, that is what a “real” lightsaber is too. Contained plasma. So a butan flame is not “that” far off. Now to find a way to shape the flame with magnets instead of relying on laminar flow and you have as close to real lightsaber as you could get.
EU and I most definitely can (that may not be surprising). But funnily enough, I bought my first car a few months ago (I drove family cars only before - all manuals) and that one is the volume knob automat. I wanted to stick with manual (pun intended), but my fiancee convinced me and I have to agree that there’s a certain comfort in automat.
I have to be honest - its a foss software, so make use of the fact that its a foss.
That’s just regular deflation.
“shrinkflation” was a term which tried top capture the size instead of price. But if you want to stay within the price semantics, then your good old deflation, stagflation, inflation will do just fine.