• Erikatharsis@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oracle are the VirtualBox people, right? I just installed that program today to try desktop Linux for the first time. I’m inferring from the comments under this post that Oracle apparently has some sort of negative reputation in the Linux community…? Frankly, I feel like a real troy-returning-with-pizza.jpeg right now.

    • MajorHavoc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Some context for you:

      Oracle has humorously called out RedHat for a recent broken promise to the open source community.

      But, Oracle is best known in the Open Source community for their purchase of Sun Microsystems resulting in Sun’s massively successful open source database MySQL going from the #1 database in use in the world to not even cracking the top ten.

      Many factors contributed, but most notable was a sudden drop in servers available to serve the documentation and help pages for MySQL.

      Oracle (coincidentally?) makes a great deal of money from their closed source Oracle Database. An inferior (in my opinion) direct competitor to MySQL.

      It’s entirely possible that Oracle did not buy Sun Microsystems with the sole intent to kill off the most popular open source database of all time.

      For those who agree that Oracle might be totally innocent in that, I agree it’s possible - and I have a bridge I would like to sell.

      • RidcullyTheBrown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        An inferior (in my opinion) direct competitor to MySQL.

        There is no comparison between the two. They don’t even compete in the same market. Oracle is an enterprise level database with features MySQL doesn’t even dream of yet, whether it is security, performance or just reliability alone. The problem with it is that the company is horrible and extorts people who actually have an use case which requires them to use oracle. They’ve built the infrastructure in such a way that one can’t just buy a database and use it by themselves, they need to buy services form the company forever. And there isn’t really a fixed price for those services. Oracle basically charges as much as it thinks the client can afford.

        Sun bought MySQL in 2008. Oracle bought Sun in 2009, but not for MySQL, they just kinda got it as a package deal. The real target was java. There wasn’t any plan to keep developing it and MySQL wasn’t making enough money on its own to be able to fund it’s own growth. There wasn’t some plot from Oracle to kill off MySQL, they simply didn’t bother with it.

        And by the way, there is a non Oracle MySQL alternative called MariaDB.

        • MajorHavoc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve migrated workloads off of Oracle onto MySQL. They are absolutely competing products.

          We can both name 11 things Oracle can do that MySQL cannot, but it doesn’t change the fact that many organizations chose between those two databases plenty of times before Oracle acquired Sun.

          MariaDB was invested in at additional cost to the open source community after Oracle bought Sun. It’s existence doesn’t absolve Oracle of the path their ownership put MySQL on.