• NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    So… setting aside the source of this explosive for a moment (because there’s a lot of speculation and no firm answer yet), can we all agree that there’s no way this killed 500 people? The impact crater is about the size of a sewer manhole (there’s one near it in the panorama image in the article).

    The initial reporting on this was sensationalized to generate outrage and sympathy.

    • HuddaBudda@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Estimation at best. They probably knew about 500 people were there, but had no idea of a body count.

      That being said, a lot of people were sleeping in the grass next to the impact site, and some in the parking lot. They are estimating around 200-300 people. Some of the people in the grass were already dead.

      But most were using it as temporary sleeping area due to the destruction of their home.

      Last point I’ll talk about is that this crater was not caused by an airstrike like Hamas claimed. And the hospital is not destroyed which they also claimed. And the ballistics show that it would have come from not Hamas, but the other faction in the region, the Islamic Jihad group territory.

      It seems I owe a few people here an apology.

      • dumdum666@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        It seems I owe a few people here an apology.

        It shows a strong character, moral compass, openness and social skills to publicly change your opinion/stance.

        You have my highest respect.

      • takeda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s no incentive for Hamas to not lie and not overestimate. What are they have to lose? Best case it will go heavily against Israel, worst case? There’s no bad case.

        We started with a hospital being hit by Israeli, 500 dead, now looks like Hamas’ rocket struck parking lot and soon we learn that only few cars got damaged.

    • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This is the thing I’ve been thinking about a lot. I definitely wouldn’t have wanted to be anywhere near that explosion, but aftermath sure doesn’t seem to line up with “500 people killed in hospital collapse caused by explosion”. I don’t even see a collapsed building in the panorama shot. Somebody’s lying their ass off, and I have no idea who it is.

      • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Based on the pictures in the article, there was definitely some damage to nearby buildings, particularly the roofs of the two buildings to the south. But “collapsed” seems to be sensationalism/clickbait. For that I would blame the journalists doing the reporting.

      • qdJzXuisAndVQb2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        Here’s a clue who’s lying. It’s the ones who claim that 500 peoole were killed, that’s a preposterous figure that Zionist haters lapped up.

        The problem is that the Israeli state has done preposterously malicious things in the past. But in this case, Hamas was trying to pull a fast one, and they honestly played a blinder.

        People will remember the outrage and disgust they felt, despite the later retraction.

        • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I haven’t seen a reputable source yet claim that the deaths weren’t in the hundreds, and none lower than 300. That’s still an enormous loss of civilian life and not meaningfully distinct from 500, IMO. I do have to go outside sometimes, meaning that I’m not getting second by second updates, so if you have a reputable source to meaningfully dispute the death count, I’d be happy to consider it.

    • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      The other issue is that Hamas released that death count less than thirty minutes after the explosion. There’s no way to get an accurate number that quickly.

      A pretty plausible scenario is that they realized the fuck up, which probably did cause an extensive number of casualties given that the courtyard was apparently full of civilians, and immediately pushed a story about Israel catastrophically bombing a hospital in order to deflect attention, in hopes that western media would repeat the story without question, which was of course a correct assumption.

    • antidote101@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s known that their hospital system has servere levels of over crowding, and the article states both that:

      The video shows cots, blankets, and other personal belongings on the grassy area. Taken together, these two videos indicate that it was likely occupied by people who were resting or sleeping there at the time of the explosion.

      And that:

      Other images from the parking lot of the hospital show widespread damage to vehicles in the parking lot, including one that was flipped over onto its roof. Another vehicle nearby shows signs of extensive damage, while others show evidence that they were engulfed in flames.

      …an over crowded space, babies in cots, with an explosion large enough to flip a car, near one of the few areas with grass soft enough to sleep on.

      Plus a fire.

      Plus due a hospital low on supplies, low on water, in need of emergency power… Could probably kill hundreds, and cause the death of more.

      If the hospital had some structural damage as well. Could probably do plenty of killing. The article doesn’t nominate a number, so I can’t speak to your source on that.

      • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Right, so, this video is addressed in the article:

        A video posted on Twitter on Tuesday night showed a grassy area adjacent to the hospital covered with dead bodies. At least two dozen bodies are visible in this video. Bellingcat is not linking to the video due to its graphic nature.

        Did you read the article?

        Not to quibble, but two dozen != 500. The difference is significant because of the effect it has had on reporting on the incident.

        • hassanmckusick@lemmy.discothe.quest
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s one thing to argue who did it because none of us are sure and “evidence” points in both directions but y’all are fucking monsters if you’re going to try and downplay the scale of the violence with absolutely no evidence.

      • dumdum666@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The video is horrific indeed - but fortunately (!) way less than than the first reported amount of people died. It is hard to really count but in the video itself it seem that less than 50 dead are shown. We don’t know if every casualty was filmed though.

        The tweet itself still blames Israel for this, so the source doesn’t even pretend to be neutral/news.