• Pheonixdown@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      If only employers cared. It has been nice, now my employer is rolling out a arbitrary but mandatory 4 days return to office policy. In like 8 years of employment I never needed to be there that much. Whatever, 100% remote job market looks decent for me, hopefully find a better place soon.

  • frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Most of the criticisms that come from the right are solvable problems, such as lack of chargers, electricity coming from dirty sources, or lithium mining. We pretty much know how to solve all those at this point. Just a matter of doing it.

    Criticisms that come from the left tend to be more fundamental. Things like car-based cities being too spread out, infrastructure costs spiraling out of control, or having the average person operate a 2 ton vehicle at speeds over 60mph and expecting this to be safe. None of those are specific to EVs, and are only solvable by looking at different transportation options.

    • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      But solving problems costs money! We need to be transferring those dollars to our wealthy donors, not spending them on public improvements!

    • doingthestuff@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The problems you’re describing from vthe right and the left are really the same problems. They’re just expressing their perception of them differently. Infrastructure solutions and spiraling costs are more challenging in less dense areas where the right tends to hold more sway. It isn’t a simple, cost effective answer. Yet.

  • Goodtoknow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    People don’t want to change the status quo or inconvenience themselves slightly in any way for the greater good. People want a magic drop in replacement that magically “fixes/solves” the environmental crisis and allows life to continue on as is. (So they don’t have to take “yucky” public transit)

    What really needs to be known though is life has to somewhat drastically change so we can make the world a healthier place for generations to come in the future.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re being downvoted because you’re right. I’ve had people argue that EVs still aren’t a good alternative because they may require a bit more effort every once in a while. Like, charging for 30 minutes at a charger on a long road trip vs just gassing up. Other than that they are pretty much a drop in alternative and people still balk at them.

      Then trying to get them to use public transit instead? Doesn’t even matter if it’s more convenient, they’re stuck in their ways and will refuse to change ever.

      Get out of your ruts people. Just because “this is the way things are” doesn’t mean it’s the best way. Ffs the amount of midwesterners who come to my city to visit and think we’re being “unsafe” by using the train, just get out of your mindsets.

    • Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What’s kinda funny is we already have a mode of public transit almost everybody, even those who drive everywhere, use: elevators. Buses, trains, etc. are only seen as “yucky” because most people (at least in America) don’t use them and refuse to spend their tax dollars on them, leaving them to be used primarily by the poor and desperate. But when you have public transit that is used by everybody, like elevators, you find they’re well-funded and well-kept, and absolutely no one will bat an eye about having to use it.

      • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It really boils down to 2 things. First is the obvious comfort, they think it’s more comfortable to be in a car. But that is broken down with traffic. You bring up traffic and they’ll complain for hours about it.

        Second is fear. They won’t admit it but they’re just terrified because they just hear of the big bad city and think stepping on a train is a one way ticket to getting stabbed, while never having any real knowledge of what it’s like.

      • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well either you could move to a different location if you want to, convince your community and local politicians to build better infrastructure, or realize that you are a minority, an edge case that usually is not adressed in these talks because a few people in remote locations using a car doesn’t hurt if we could get rid of car dependency in densely populated areas where the vast majority of humans live.

      • Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Vote to allow more dense, mixed-use, transit-oriented development as well as more and better public transit. In many cases there’s a chicken-and-egg problem of NIMBYs blocking new, denser development because of fears of bringing too much traffic, but the public transit that would allay those fears isn’t built because there’s not enough density.

        And so what happens is places get stuck in a trap of perpetual car-dependence, which is bad for the environment, bad for the economy, and bad for social equality (cars are super expensive and thus a particular burden on lower income folks, and many people with disabilities simply can’t drive).

        The only way to break the cycle is for people to recognize what’s happening and intentionally vote their way out of it.

      • Ataraxia@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        On bike those distance are fine. Ebikes exist also. Either way I’d rather life and society adjusted itself to a slower commute than the danger and depression of car based transportation infrastructure. I used to ride my hike one hour to get groceries and an hour back. Those who are disabled can ride the bus and train. A lot of changes need to be made. Infrastructure and people need to change. I’d rather have a car free safe road for walking and riding my bike. We will all live longer to just from exercise and safer travel in general.

    • ch00f@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Try arguing that people should bring their own bags to the grocery store. Responses get hilarious quickly.

  • johnthedoe@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I tell people yes do get an EV for your next car. But also use this chance to really think about if you need the car at all. Or does every adult in the household need a car each. Our city is trash for everyone having to own a car.

    Best is to run your car to the ground. Then get an EV if you must own a car.

    • drdalek13@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      If I could guarantee that my job is remote forever, or have it written in my contract, I would sell my car.

      • BeefPiano@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Your car will be worth less the longer you hang on to it. You can sell it and hang on to the money until your company tries to get everyone back in the office.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Best is to run your car to the ground.

      Absolutely not if you have an older ICE car with bad gas mileage and/or a diesel. Even getting a NEW EV would be better for global warming and the health of your fellow humans than continuing THAT shit show.

      Of course, as per the OP, bicycle and mass transit is still much better than any EV, but the really bad emissions cars should NOT stay on the road until their “natural” death unless absolutely necessary.

      • Leer10@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t understand. I thought there’s more emissions being made from the creation of the EV and its lithium battery than using the remaining life of a gas beater.

        • Grayox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          They offset the Co2 used in production at around 40k miles, but the batteries are extremely recycleable as battery banks for solar systems, or as raw material for new batteries since it is already out of the ground and they have processes to recycle it now. The gas burned by a car can never be recycled or reused and is extremely inefficient in moving a vehicle. Not to mention the toll extracting fossil fuels is having on this planet. EVs get almost 200 mpg equivalent because of their efficiencies of motors and aerodynamics.

        • johnthedoe@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The idea is the concentration of lithium production can be more controlled (and recycled?) as opposed to leaving gas guzzlers out on the road. Plus the distribution of gas to gas stations and such.

          As much as I want an EV. My country is just not set up for a smooth transition to EV yet. Until then it’s best to just not give the auto industry more sales and run what you have until you’re realistically ready.

    • andy_wijaya_med@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Live in a not so small town in Germany. I haven’t had the need to have a car after I have been living for 9 years.

      I commute with bike to work, take public transport when it’s a farther journey.

      Until I have a daughter a couple of months ago. I realize that I really need a car. :(

  • bestnerd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    If I could hop on a train from the country side or ride my bike 20m on a dirt road or ice and winter to get to a store I’d be happy but that’s not happening

      • bonn2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you live in a city or its suburbs maybe, I live a 20 minute drive away from civilization. Not going to get public transit out there any time soon unfortunately.

  • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Bikes sound like a great idea until you decide to live in the hills/mountains, or a place where it rains/snows often, or you need to buy more than 4 bags of groceries, or you live in a desert, or you are moving furniture.

    • saigot@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      eBikes really take the sting out of hills.

      I live where it snows a lot, winter tires are a must, but so long as bike lanes are properly cleared it’s not really a problem (big IF I know), until it gets to -25C or colder the cold isn’t really a problem (you warm up fast peddling, I normally find myself unzipping my jacket).

      My cargo bike is enough for me to take 2 weeks of groceries for 4 people. The largest thing I have transported has been a fridge (which funnily enough couldn’t fit in my EV). the bike is rated for 200Kg, but I would bet it can take more if you don’t mind going a little slower. I have also transported lawn mowers, bar stools and a rocking chair. For anything bigger than that 30bucks on a uhaul is more than worthwhile, although I look forward to electric uhauls.

      • Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, I live in Montreal which gets like 90 inches of snow annually and can get down to the -20s Celsius regularly in the winter. And yet I (and many others) still bike throughout the winter. Turns out having good protected bike infrastructure and plowing it regularly in the winter makes biking perfectly practical even in the middle of a cold, snowy winter.

        In fact, two of the best cities for biking in North America are Montreal and Minneapolis, both very cold and snowy in the winter.

      • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        E-bikes still have a massive carbon footprint compared to regular bicycles, and the battery efficiency is very adversely effected by high heat (deserts) and low heat (snow) .

        Either way, a car, even if its an EV, will be the better pick for every situation I stated above.

        • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          E-bikes still have a massive carbon footprint compared to regular bicycles,

          The comparison is not between regular bikes and e bikes but between e bikes and cars. E bikes win this.

          Either way, a car, even if its an EV, will be the better pick for every situation I stated above.

          A 3000€ gaming machine will be better in any task than a 500€ office pc. But as long as the office pc is sufficient, why spend the extra money?

        • saigot@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          E-bikes still have a massive carbon footprint compared to regular bicycles

          Don’t let perfect be the enemy of good. If you’d prefer to use a purely pedel bike go right ahead, but I find having a boost for heavy loads and hills makes biking preferable in situations it otherwise wouldn’t be. My battery is a 0.8kwh battery, which is more or less 15 iPhone batteries strapped together. My car is a 65kwh battery, literally 100x bigger for only 10x the range. While hard to find info, my understanding is my car is one of the more efficient ones out there too.

          battery efficiency

          Never comes into play, my bike has a 40km range with no load and no pedaling so typically even in winter the battery is far bigger than most trips I would take. There is also a longer range option (I think 100km) and you can quick swap the batteries if you really wanted to marathon. I do take the battery inside in winter as starting it warm does help it alot. I probably would be more hesitant to take heavy things in particular if I didn’t have the battery.

          Either way, a car, even if its an EV, will be the better pick for every situation I stated above.

          Well no, if you look at my comment I do own a car (bolt euv). I literally couldnt take the fridge in the car, i had to go home and grab my bike which could carry it. I use my bike because my city has good infrastructure that makes it quicker than driving. No need to hunt for parking, and the exercise is nice. Being able to use it while lightly intoxicated is also a plus.

        • WalrusDragonOnABike@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Lifecycle emissions of ebiking can be a couple times lower unless you eat very green. Its been regularly over 100F here and I wish it was a desert so I didn’t have to also deal with humidity: I’ve ridden in thunderstorms and think its nicer than riding the middle of the sunny summer days. Either way, still better than driving in traffic. For moving large things, a car is not any better. And driving around a moving van every day would be a huge waste when you can just use them when you need them and drive a much better vehicle (a bike) when you don’t.

        • sexy_peach@feddit.deOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ebikes actually have a lower carbon footprint compared to regular bikes, because they go more kilometers in their lifespan.

        • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Exactly. And in a hilly/mountainous area, you get a bike with multiple gears (21 gear bikes are not a rarity even in the north german plains where I live) or with electric motor support. If you need to get a lot of groceries you either do groceries more often or get a cargo bike. For bad weather there’s clothing.

          Nobody says a bike is perfect for everyone. But the vast majority of people live in urban environments and don’t need to haul tons of cargo daily. Bikes are a piece of the puzzle and if only those people had a car who actually need one often it could be a huge piece.

          • uis@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            21 gear bikes are not a rarity even in the north german plains where I live

            It is not amount of gears that matter, it is range of transmission that does.

            For bad weather there’s clothing.

            Yeah, it seems a lot of people just don’t know or don’t want to know what proper clothing is. Maybe they don’t even know it exists.

            Nobody says a bike is perfect for everyone.

            Well, anyone who can’t use bike will use powered wheelchair.

            • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              It is not amount of gears that matter, it is range of transmission that does.

              You are completely right. I just don’t want to get too nerdy here.

              Yeah, it seems a lot of people just don’t know or don’t want to know what proper clothing is. Maybe they don’t even know it exists.

              Which is surprising given how many people I see wearing super expensive outdoor/hiking jackets to go from the parking lot to the supermarket every time a drop of rain falls.

      • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago
        1. You picked a subcompact car, rather than a vehicle that any person with more than one braincell would pick for moving furniture, such as a truck.

        2. You 100% will have a better time doing everything else I said in even a subcompact like the Polo than a bicycle.

        • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago
          1. But I don’t need a bigger car 99.999 percent of the time. Why should I buy a bigger one and pay it while not needing it instead of take a rental when I need to?

          2. Please read my other comment.

    • Ertebolle@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      One thing that would go a long way in helping with that would be if we improved the quality of urban schools / parks to the point where fewer people felt like they had to move to the suburbs to start families.

      • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yes, that would help, but that would require major reworking of large areas. Additionally, having a large density of population all living on top of each other presents its own unique problems.

        Really, its a situation where different people and places need different solutions. Some can use public transport and bicycles, and some cannot. And unless the Earths population becomes so large that every square inch of the planet is as dense as a place like Kowloon, cars will continue to fill a use that bicycles and public transport can never fill.

        • Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          And unless the Earths population becomes so large that every square inch of the planet is as dense as a place like Kowloon, cars will continue to fill a use that bicycles and public transport can never fill.

          Cars didn’t exist until 200 years ago and didn’t gain the depandance they have now until 60ish year ago. Cars will cease to exist sometime in the future.

          We’re living in a small bubble in history where cars exist, the question is if we want to gradually reduce dependancy on cars now, or wait for the forceful bandage removal.

    • uis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Finland would like to talk with you. At the end of talk your world will be shattered. Your ribs will be shattered as well.

    • Ataraxia@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I lived on top of a steep hill where it gets icy and we still rode bikes. You learn pretty quickly. You should watch mountain biker down mountain races on YouTube. People are more like mountain goats than you know!

    • doleo@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      If only you could pedal a bike like you peddle that bullshit argument.

    • w2tpmf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Most of the people spouting the “everyone should ride a bike” stuff don’t have to feed a family of 4+ people.

      • Barbarian@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I keep getting really confused reading comments like this, then remembering “Ah, yeah, probably an American who doesn’t have a small supermarket with all the everyday stuff literally next door”

    • sexy_peach@feddit.deOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      How many people live in a desert? How many people live in the hills/mountains? Most people don’t.

      • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Nearly every person in South California, which is an incredibly high density of population? The entire bottom half of California is practically a desert, literally home to one of the hottest deserts in the entire planet the Mojave which contains the appropriately named Death Valley.

        How about the people that live in parts of Arizona, Nevada, Utah, much of southern Texas, and New Mexico? And thats just in the United States. What about people in other continents like Africa and Asia? Large areas of those continents contain entire countries whose borders never leave desert or hills and mountains. Nearly the entire Middle East and top half of Africa is desert. A large part of Australia is desert, its like more than 50% of the continent. 1/5 of the entire land area of Earth is a desert.

      • PatFusty@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah fuck them. If they dont do what I do then then can go to hell am i right. Pls like and subscribe, 5 likes and ill turn into the hulk and rip my weiner off

      • El_illuminacho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        “Most people”, where? Because most people in, let’s say, Norway, live in areas with hills and mountains. The US isn’t the whole world you know.

    • sexy_peach@feddit.deOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you use it every day and can afford it, maybe look at brand electric bikes! They’re a bit like bikes, but sturdier and on bad/rainy days and whatnot it really motivates to have the motors help. They’re almost like motor scooters, if you ever had one.

      • lobut@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is ebike theft an issue? I’m paranoid about my push bike that I have no idea how I’d leave an ebike out.

        • sexy_peach@feddit.deOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes it is but you can get cheap insurance, just like you would get for a motor scooter or a car.

  • Designate@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not possible where I live, not enough public transport, not enough bike lanes and too far to travel Daily

    • doingthestuff@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah I have zero public transit, no bike lanes, no sidewalks, no shoulders on the road - just two fast curvy lanes and a ditch. The last time I walked to the corner store I had three people stop and offer me a ride because it is too dangerous to even walk. Forget biking, no one is that stupid here. Well maybe a couple, I’ve seen bikes painted in memory of dead riders on the side of the road.

    • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Manufacturing, generation of electricity with heavy use of fossil fuels (could be changed and is changing in many places, luckily) and particulate matter (for example through tire wear) mainly.

      Still better than ICEs though.

      • rayyyy@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Then too, the current EVs are going to evolve. We are just at an awkward stage of development.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s plenty of issues with making a fully enclosed vehicle sustainable regardless of drive train. Just the amount of metal needed of any kind.

      They will probably always be needed for last mile deliveries or people with certain disabilities. That said, if we could get most North American cities to just 20% bike usage for people’s major commuting choice, that’d be transformative.

      • MrGG@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh so you must be a very ripe peach!

        But if you’re a peach how are you communicating? Are you still attached to your tree? Are there other sentient peaches?

        • sexy_peach@feddit.deOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I am still attached to a tree luckily. Unfortunately I am the only sentient peach, but I have a computer so I can use lemmy :3

          • MrGG@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            🍑🍑🍑🍑 🍑🍑 🍑🍑 🍑🍑🍑🍑, 🍑🍑🍑🍑🍑!

    • Buttons@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is actually a legit excuse. If someone is working more than one job to afford rent, are we just going to tell them to walk an hour back and forth to the grocery store every day for food?

      If the solution is for people to do things that require more time, the first step is to make sure people have more time.