Maybe if I asked for a source rudely, people would have taken my request legitimately instead of assuming “sealioning”. Can’t win, never mind being polite.
Thank you (sincerely) for going half-way. I did not know that prisons make money.
I’m asking for a source that prisons rake on billions, you assholes. I did not know that, and thought that prisons were a net loss.
Can you please provide a source for this
This is the only acceptable answer
So the same behavior as the folks of the rainbow flag then?
My ex wasn’t diagnosed with anything, but has an autistic sister and strange behaviors herself. Being suspicious of myself (I was diagnosed with ADHD during a time you couldn’t have both) and having always carefully observed people (to mask better), I noticed some qualities the two shared, but the symptoms were more subtle in my ex. She has been tested but not diagnosed, and I think the doctors were wrong. But, yes, symptoms observed had a distinctly feminine skew, or even a different mode of application. She did not get the help I know she needed (and she mistakenly held the opinion that the doctors are nigh-infallible, and that I am not ASD either).
I had the save thought and the same wish-wash conclusion.
Arthur C. Clark.
My own: science is the scrutiny of magic.
Yes, indeed, and fuck you too.
What about the outlook thing? Don’t understand.
Everyone is misrepresented in the two-party system.
Thank you my unbiased friend
Only if it makes you incompetent and feel stupid
Both parties.
Need a citation for that one chief, I’m pretty sure it says your body is a temple to be respected and cared for.
Not a good first impression (other comments have my thoughts covered) and I think I’ll stick with Firefox.
Unless they impress us by re-writing it in a quality-first language, and make all configuration declarative, and drop support for some cruft. They’re going to have to try something bold and different to impress me, otherwise, this seems like more of the same, and an uphill battle at that.