So, we have been progessing over time, until recently, correct?
Now lets bring being poor as a different demographic than white male in history as well.
So, we have been progessing over time, until recently, correct?
Now lets bring being poor as a different demographic than white male in history as well.
But would you consider that poor then? Maybe money was easier to obtain, but starvation/malnutrition rates have constantly been on a steady decline until the last few years. Not often you see people using a burlap sack to cloth their families, child labor, things like that. And we do have a lot of social programs like SNAP that didnt exist pre-1970s.1980s had the Homeless act. The world has changed drastically in the last 50-100 years.
But I guess you could make solid arguments that the economy is generally harder now, so its worse for the majority, incuding the poor.
Fuck billionaires and all, but I think two things are wrong with this.
First, comparing hollywood to real life. They were making super yachts in the 1800s. El Mahrousa was built in 1865 and still in the top 10 in size.
But those megayachts sre super unnecessary and terrible for enviroment.
Secondly, times just generally changed. Poor people shifted a lot too. 1970s poor was a lot more poor than modern poor generally.
But we should still fix the system that fucks over thr majority.
Wait, so you are saying you have either lived continuously on a 29ft boat for 5 years, or only have visited land by dinghy or something while its anchored?
Wild. That’s got to be a nasty looking hull though.
If you consider that healthcare for everyone, then America as a whole bears and shares the cost of healthcare for everyone because of Obamacare?
But this is also an article about Massachusetts…
Idk why you are talking about scraping when I said API?
And is all that information in the training contract?
Its just an API, right?
I’m trying hard to find a fact that its getting worse, but seems like the last research done on the temporary/permanently swapped babies was 1998, and the handling of babies has improved greatly since then.
Have you read something that makes it sound worse?
60 million a year for access to the relatively public data… That seems pretty good to me tbh.
Is Taylor Swift’s fan base still “youth”?
I mean, check all the numbers around the country. Obviously numbers are going to increase closer to election season, especially another very controversial one.
Let’s just hope Swift isnt the big moving force, since the candidates she endorsed in Tenessee in 2018 lost while she was getting the same type of news stories
I dont know a physiological difference, but being around skateboarding for 25+ years… Males definitely had/have a higher ceiling
I think this is silly and her influence is blown way out of proportion.
But Taylor Swift has endorsed candidates in the past.
Its not a conspiracy… You are obviously not involved in the actual ML/AI, but another sector. You aren’t speaking in any technical explaination.
A lot of us are involved in the technical aspect and understand what is being said by management.
Yeah you definitely went to a marketing thing and got marketed to
I’d imagine figuring out that “more to it” is the big leap that would satisfy the “LLM is not AI” people. Probability plays a lot into our decision making, but there is a lot more going on in our brains than that.
I’m still hoping that Neal Stephenson was right that they are also quantum connectors to every other versions of our brains through dimensions. That’d be cool
I am really convinced there is a Kagi marketing department dedicated to Lemmy. But if it really works that much better for you, that’s great.
But I wouldnt only bank on the logic “the fact that it’s paid, I don’t have to worry about how they are monetizing my data”. A lot of paid services still try to find ways for more money
Are you asking what it means? Large Language Model, if thats what you are asking. Its what people are usually talking about when they talk about AI.
It has no intellegence, but they can be impressive probability machines
Because there was a black millionaire in the early 1900s, it was easier to be poor and black before/during the civil rights movement than it is in modern day?
I dont feel like we are having a coherent converation and these replies are purely reactive?