i seriously doubt this stuff has changed that much. it would essentially do away with the whole “draft and stash” strategy for overseas players which i’m pretty sure would have been talked about a lot by now.
i seriously doubt this stuff has changed that much. it would essentially do away with the whole “draft and stash” strategy for overseas players which i’m pretty sure would have been talked about a lot by now.
and those lazy stone age humans didn’t want to work hunting and gathering all the time so they invented agriculture.
they have to build it from scratch to do that though.
that’s only if they don’t play any ball in that time. if they play in college or overseas the clock stops, per #49 here:
THJ’s contract isn’t big enough to warrant more than 2nds. At least he should be able to provide some shooting for you guys though.
I think you can re-enter the draft the following year in hopes of getting picked by another team.
I don’t think that’s true, that defeats the entire purpose of the draft. If a team selects a player they retain the draft rights forever unless the rights are traded. but yes teams generally try to avoid hostile players for other reasons, it’s usually not worth the hassle.
how does that help? doesn’t the nba team who drafts them retain the rights til they come to the nba?
i have to assume Langdon has a general plan for that already.
LA will take him if no one else does first.
yes, the force applied to THE ROCK will be much higher, but the car’s mass is not relevant to the driver’s reference inside the car.
Not if they crash into stationary objects like rocks, etc. In that case the amount of force the driver will experience will be 2-3 times higher compared to the amount of force a driver of a normal sedan will experience if he had the same accident.
this is not true, the deceleration (g force) imparted to passengers should be the same in either case. (all other things being equal, initial speed, crumple zones, etc). adding more mass to the car is irrelevant to the driver if you’re hitting a truly immovable object.
because they’re safer for the drivers
also SUVs became the new minivan because minivans aren’t cool. with an suv you can cosplay as an off-roader who goes mountaineering on the weekends and drives uphill through snow both ways to work and back.
he has had some dickish moments but when you’re constantly talking publicly that’s pretty inevitable unless you’re a saint.
what about that good ole “free” speech elon?
deleted by creator
I’m pretty sure some companies are also using it to encourage people to quit before layoffs and needing to pay out severance. Happened to me earlier this year. In December they announced we’d go from optionally fully remote, to mandatory 3-days in office in February. Then at the end of march they laid off a bunch of people.
So watch the timing at Dell, I wonder if we’ll see some layoffs there in a couple months.
You said:
We shut down reactors of which no one knows how functional they are because no one checked that because they were scheduled to be shut down anyways.
If they weren’t scheduled to be shut down in the first place people would have known they worked.
I don’t know about Europe as a whole but in Germany we did not shut down functional reactors. We shut down reactors of which no one knows how functional they are because no one checked that because they were scheduled to be shut down anyways.
That’s functionally the same thing. And it does matter to discuss. Even if you believe the ship has sailed in Germany, it hasn’t elsewhere, and Germany’s experience can be useful to learn from.
also the fights in that game only took a few minutes. definitely something you could pick up and drop while in a waiting room as the person above said.