• 0 Posts
  • 27 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 11th, 2023

help-circle




  • Redscare867@lemmy.mltoWorld News@lemmy.worldOzone hole goes large again
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    You realize that banning CFC’s did have massive implications on industry right? Most CFC use was industrial. This comment really just shows that you’re clueless on the history of this issue. Consumer air conditioning was far from the only casualty. If we had not banned CFC’s then the ozone layer would be in an absolutely dire state today.

    The Montreal Protocol is literally proof that if international governments wanted to they could come together and stop industry from destroying the planet, and you think we should roll that back for air conditioning? Give me a fucking break dude.


  • That we should go back to knowingly destroying the ozone layer because the lingering effects of our previous attempts at destroying it haven’t gotten completely better yet and that has had bad effects on air conditioning. Won’t anyone think of the poor deprived people forced to sit in their cars that are a sweltering 70 degrees Fahrenheit?




  • Voting is the absolute smallest political action anyone could ever take. Protest always has been and always will be more effective at moving the needle. Above all else these ghouls want to preserve capitalism. If it looks like the only way they preserve capitalism in the near term is capitulating to the demands of environmentalists then that is what will happen. Of course in the long term capitalists will attempt to erode these gains just like they have done with social safety nets in various countries for largely the same reasons (increased rate of profit).



  • Redscare867@lemmy.mltoMemes@lemmy.mlTankies
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Capitalist forces absolutely are not inevitable with scarcity. Native Americans lived in societies that have been described as primitive communism. Did they not have scarcity?

    Further, mass murder is not a prerequisite for communism.


  • Redscare867@lemmy.mltoMemes@lemmy.mlTankies
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    10 months ago

    You really are not as informed on communist thought as you think you are. Nor are you very informed on the very real problems with the IMF or WTO saying that these organizations save countries from “communist policies” is so hysterically wrong that I can’t believe it’s an actual thought that someone had. This discussion clearly isn’t going anywhere because it’s like I’m talking to a brick wall. Have a nice life.


  • Redscare867@lemmy.mltoMemes@lemmy.mlTankies
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    10 months ago

    Social democracy does not fix every problem communism claims to because it preserves capitalism. Social democracy, but without capitalism is no longer social democracy. That is socialism. Believe it or not, communists are pro-socialism.

    All of the Scandinavian social democracies that are supposedly the gold standard are former colonial powers. Colonial powers extract wealth from their colonies to the detriment of the indigenous inhabitants of the colony. This is referred to as primitive accumulation and is a direct precursor to capitalism. These nations built their wealth through colonialism and continue to maintain wealth through neocolonialism. This is really only unheard of or controversial if you have your head in the ground. Look up the WTO and the IMF and how they fuck over the global south at the benefit of wealthy nations if you’re interested in more information (spoilers: you’re not)

    Where are your sources that all communists are fascists? Are the communists in the Philippines fighting their fascist government also fascists? What about in India? The list goes on. You’ll find that neither of these groups of communists are particularly fond of China by the way.


  • Redscare867@lemmy.mltoMemes@lemmy.mlTankies
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    10 months ago

    Communists are very aware that social democracy exists. Social democracy very famously split out of socialist thought. Originally social democracy was another term for socialism.

    Communists take issue with the very real fact that social democracy preserves capitalism and thus the exploitation that comes with it. Social democracy simply exports that exploitation. Without the subjugation of the global south, social democracy could not exist. Just because you have exported that exploitation doesn’t mean it went away.




  • Redscare867@lemmy.mltoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldTiananmen square 1989
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Within real communist communities? No. Within revisionist communities absolutely.

    Communists haven’t supported China since the death of Mao whenever Deng Xiaopeng and his ilk took power. You can read plenty of official statements by Peruvian, Indian, and Filipino communists parties (that have actually attempted/are attempting revolution) who denounce China as a revisionist social imperialist power in exactly the same way that China denounced the USSR following the revisionists rise to power.