Hypnoctopus

Is the article mentioned the criteria for a video? I don’t care enough about it to read the article. Can the video be like one of those YouTube shorts and and still be worth the 25 bucks?

I said I’m no pro and just spitballing, your last line about being a simp is pretty strange.

3 videos a day for 5.5 months (about 167 days). That’s 500 videos. 500 x $25 = $12500, not $1250.

I have no clue if it’s feasible to make three videos a day for 5.5 months, but I guess if the length of the video doesn’t matter then It must be doable.

It could be worth it if they can also make money through other companies for the same videos. Plus if they’re popular enough that Amazon is paying them then they must already be making ad revenue or something.

I don’t know. I’m not a pro, just spitballing.

You’re missing the point entirely 😀

The point is that news about Twitter rebranding is simply not related to technology. This is a technology community. These submissions should not even be posted in the first place to have the opportunity to be voted on.

“I don’t understand why it exists, so it’s gotta be god.” (Pronounced jod, btw)

If you’re trolling, you’re doing a great job.

On the one hand, Chuck Norris is a weird fucking guy these days.

On the other hand, in the golden age of memes back in like 2011 or whatever, I made a Chuck Norris fact that wasn’t so well received:

Chuck Norris can speak in cursive.

I thought it was pretty good.

Thank you for reducing your meat consumption. I know you can go all the way with it.

Knowing everything about my body.

What is my current blood sugar? O2 level electrolyte status? How much shit do I have in my colon?

C all the way. Sit there and let the dandruff shampoo do its job. Relaxing. Not with my head in the water of course.

"I don’t want to have to write out some long String in terminal to install software. "

I’m no expert, but isn’t it literally just apt get (name of software) to download and install through terminal?

Does lift off have the feature to highlight a comment and then hit a button to go directly to the next parent level comment?

The article says that according to the guy who sued him, he had accepted the terms of a contract through text message.

However, it doesn’t say that according to the guy that sued him, he had accepted a contract specifically through the sending of 👍 in a text message in the past.

The article did not say that he had ever used 👍 previously in text to accept a contract. It says that according to the guy who sued him, he had responded through text message in the past to accept a contract.

In this particular case the defendant had a history of using 👍to accept a contract. Had done it NP a dozen times before

The article doesn’t say that. It says that according to the guy who sued him, he used text message before to accept a contract. It doesn’t say that he had ever responded to a contract with a thumbs up emoji before.

“Mickleborough said the emoji amounted to an agreement because he had texted numerous contracts to Achter, who previously confirmed through text message and always fulfilled the order.”

No mention of thumbs up emoji having been used prior to this particular thumbs up emoji incident.

The article doesn’t say that. It says that according to the guy who sued him, he used text message before to accept a contract. It doesn’t say that he had ever responded to a contract with a thumbs up emoji before.

“Mickleborough said the emoji amounted to an agreement because he had texted numerous contracts to Achter, who previously confirmed through text message and always fulfilled the order.”

No mention of thumbs up emoji having been used prior to this particular thumbs up emoji incident. Are you referencing an alternate source?

NO! I REFUSE TO BELIEVE IT! (WARIO STYLE “MMEEEEEEEHHHHHH”) (runs away).

and the same people complaining about the same people constantly complaining about reposts that most of the community haven’t seen 🙄

Nice to see the same Reddit reposts over here as well 🙃