I’m not sure if I have a favorite game but if I had to choose one I’ll probably have to say Dungeon Crawl Stone Soup given the amount of time I have spent with that game.

When I read these things I still doubt to myself they can come up with enough loyalists *that do have qualifications for the job. *.

You do not have to be dumb to be evil. I’m not American but I follow the news and you people (and indirectly we all) seem to have a really big problem.

At Justice Alito’s House, a ‘Stop the Steal’ Symbol on Display
An upside-down flag, adopted by Trump supporters contesting the Biden victory, flew over the justice’s front lawn as the Supreme Court was considering an election case.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/16/us/justice-alito-upside-down-flag.html

deleted by creator

If you actually took the time to watch those videos

I’ve better things to do than to watch some dude on YouTube that lives of sensationalist video titles

And: The problem of nuclear waste disposal seems not to be solved. There is active R&D ongoing.

Source (not some Dude on YouTube):

Although many countries with nuclear power plants have programmes to develop spent fuel or HLW disposal, these programmes are at very different levels of maturity, especially as concerns the siting process and the selection of a site. Three countries, Finland, France and Sweden, have selected a site and are progressing towards licensing and construction. Other countries have time schedules to begin operation of repositories in the 2050s and 2060s and have started an active siting process. The general trend is to site such a facility in a willing and informed volunteer host community

IAEA Nuclear Energy Series; Status and Trends in Spent Fuel and Radioactive Waste Management (PDF)

You are not really linking a video from a YouTube channel that features videos like “Can Nuclear Fallout Create Ghouls?”, “One-Punch Man Breaks Physics AGAIN”, “The government let me kiss nuclear waste.” and “How to Defeat Roko’s Basilisk”?

Germany is the second largest contributor of military aid to Ukraine. There are other “wamongering tribes” that seem to send much less.

https://www.statista.com/chart/27278/military-aid-to-ukraine-by-country/

As long as it is not dryied yet

The law doesn’t make a distinction between dried or not dried. This is only used for measurement. It only distinguishes between alive and dead.

Just cook it out for example.

It’s still a dead cannabis plant.

This law makes no sense in this regard. Allowing three plants just so you have to destroy two an a half of them.

And at one point in time you will be in possession of an illegal amount of cannabis. Even if it is for a short period of time. Sure, you probably won’t be caught but it still seems to be illegal according to CanG

You are allowed to posses 3 plants + 50g consume ready product.

Sure. As long as the 3 plants are alive:

§ 3, Abs 2 CanG reads:

Personen, die das 18. Lebensjahr vollendet haben, ist abweichend von Absatz 1 im Geltungsbereich dieses Gesetzes an ihrem Wohnsitz oder an ihrem gewöhnlichen Aufenthalt der Besitz von Cannabis wie folgt erlaubt:

(1) von bis zu 50 Gramm Cannabis, bei Blüten, blütennahen Blättern oder sonstigem Pflanzenmaterial der Cannabispflanze bezogen auf das Gewicht nach dem Trocknen, und

(2) von bis zu drei lebenden Cannabispflanzen

https://dserver.bundestag.de/btd/20/104/2010426.pdf

Translated by Google:

By way of derogation from paragraph 1, persons who have reached the age of 18 shall be permitted to possess cannabis at their domicile or habitual residence within the scope of this Act as follows:

(1) up to 50 grams of cannabis, in the case of flowers, near-flower leaves or other plant material of the cannabis plant in relation to the weight after drying, and

(2) of up to three live cannabis plants

That is 3 plants that are alive(!). If I’m harvesting or the plant dies of other causes, the plant is no longer alive and I’m suddenly in the possession of much more than the 50 grams allowed by law (and the whole plant counts, not just the buds).

I had a very quick look at the law. It’s a first step. Better than nothing and long overdue. I’m thankful but the law itself seems to be in part contradictory.

I.e.: I’m allowed to grow three cannabis plants. Sounds good? I’m additionally not allowed to own more than 50 grams of cannabis plant material (buds, leafs and stem). How should i even grow a single cannabis plant without making myself culpable?

I guess we’ll have to wait and see how these contradictions are handled by the courts.

Hast Du den Artikel gelesen? Darum geht es doch überhaupt nicht.

Da lässt der Verteidigungsminister die Menschen wissen, dass binnen fünf Jahren ein russischer Angriff auf das europäische Nato-Territorium “möglich” sei, während die Bundeswehr für eine derartige Aggression nicht gerüstet ist. Dieser zutiefst beunruhigenden Mitteilung von Boris Pistorius folgt dann aber nicht etwa ein im Kabinett abgesprochener Fünfjahresplan zur Ertüchtigung der Armee inklusive Finanzierung, sondern: nichts Genaues. Was sollen die Menschen damit anfangen, außer sich zu fürchten und der Regierung noch weniger zu vertrauen, als sie es ohnehin schon tun?

[…]

Während es die SPD also jüngst fertigbrachte, existenzielle sicherheitspolitische Ängste und Bedrohungen noch zu verstärken, machten sich Robert Habeck und Christian Lindner daran, die wirtschaftliche Verunsicherung der Menschen zu forcieren. Erst äußerten sie in dramatischen Worten ihre Sorge um die Entwicklung der Wirtschaft – ähnlich wie Pistorius es mit der sicherheitspolitischen tat –, um dann einander widersprechende Vorschläge zu machen, wie diesem Niedergang zu begegnen sei. Der eine will dafür nämlich – Überraschung! – mehr Staat und Schulden, der andere weniger. Dass Habeck und Lindner ihre verstörende Botschaft noch mit einem Selfie dekorierten, das dem aus vermeintlich besseren grün-gelben Zeiten ähnelte, verwirrte die Kommunikation der beiden Meisterredner noch auf einer weiteren Ebene.

[…]

Dieser Unernst, verbunden mit einem frappierenden Mangel an Disziplin, wurde dann am Wochenende seitens der FDP auf die Spitze getrieben. Während also der Nuklearschirm löchrig geredet und der Wirtschaftsstandort von den zuständigen Ministern infrage gestellt wurde, kurz nachdem Wladimir Putin mit dem Mord an Alexej Nawalny der Welt noch einmal zeigte, wie gefährlich er ist, während die Ampel sich in autoaggressiver Routine über die Bezahlkarte für Flüchtlinge, die Cannabislegalisierung, das Lieferkettengesetz, die Taurus-Lieferungen, die Schuldenbremse und vieles andere stritt, gab der Generalsekretär der FDP, Bijan Djir-Sarai, einer Sonntagszeitung seine schwarz-gelben Wunschträume zu Protokoll und trat damit wieder einmal eine Koalitionsdebatte los. Dazu muss man wissen, dass ein Generalsekretär so was üblicherweise kaum ohne Wissen seines Parteivorsitzenden macht, so gesehen könnte man von einer abgesprochenen Taktik reden, wäre nicht alles so komplett durchgedreht.

[…]

Was die Ampel gerade tut, ist beunruhigend, allerdings wird die Sache erst richtig unheimlich, wenn man sich ansieht, was sie unterlässt. Der Kanzler beispielsweise führt nicht, weder den Verteidigungsminister noch seine beiden Stellvertreter; was Olaf Scholz sagt, kommt bei den Menschen nicht an, was vielleicht an seinem Charakter liegt, möglicherweise aber auch daran, dass der Zweck seines Sprechens die Beruhigung ist, es soll wohl mehr ein Brummen sein, nur ist das politische Getriebe offenkundig kaputt.

Es ist einfach handwerklich schlecht, was die Koalition an öffentlichem Bild liefert. Der zuständige Kanzler mit seiner Richtlinienkompetenz? Mehr oder weniger abgetaucht. Die beiden anderen Koalitionspartner? Am dauerstreiten. Die SPD? Guckt zu. Die FDP? sagt öffentlich, dass die Koalition nichts taugt und man lieber mit der CDU will. Von der gibt es aber sofort ein Kontra. Und das in einer Zeit voller Krisen, in der die Menschen Vertrauen in die Regierung und die Zukunft brauchen. Das kann man ja haben wenn man will aber diese Regierung macht einem das wahrlich nicht einfach.

Das hat alles nichts mit 16 Jahren Merkel (und SPD/FDP) zu tun. Das ist komplett sebstverschuldet.

I haven’t used Manjaro myself but I heard that it is not as good as Arch. Rumors I heard where that it is not as solid as vanilla Arch. YMMV.

Which one(s)

Arch.

why?

1. The Arch-Wiki
2. I like pacman
3. The Arch-Wiki
4. I wanted a rolling-release distribution.
5. The Arch-Wiki
6. It just works. I had only one more serious problem in ~8 years of running Arch
7. Did I mention the Arch-Wiki?

Edit:

Having said that, I have an eye on immutable distros. Maybe one day I’ll try one out.

(…) EU court says

The European Court of Human Rights does not belong to the European Union but to the Council of Europe which has nothing to do with the EU. A journalist should know that.

It has nothing to do with Trump. Even theoretically that can’t be the case European budgets haven’t suddenly changed in the last couple of days.

for example that Telegram was able to defeat the Russian government by simply changing the IP address

Nowhere in the article is “defeat” mentioned. The article reads:

But all the while, Telegram’s lawyers tried to fight the original give-up-your-keys order in the courts. It had no luck in Russia itself, which is how the case ended up at the European Court of Human Rights.

Edit:

This is my last comment. You succeeded in derailing the thread. Congratulations.

These claims mislead users by making Telegram look like a champion of user privacy at its best

So what? This is not the topic of this thread. This thread is about a ECHR ruling / privacy and I would like to keep the discussion on topic. I do not care how evil Telegram is.

Do you want me to give you links to Russian laws that

This article is not about the Russian law. It is about a judgement by the ECHR (33696/19). You are telling us, that the article is “fake-news” and I asked you to proof your claim. I did my part and delivered the judgement itself. Now it’s your time to proof, that this judgement never happened.

Edit:

BTW. this article and the judgement is not about Telegram vs. Russian Federation. It is about Anton Valeryevich Podchasov vs. the Russian Federation with Mr. Podchasov being a Telegram user. That is my current understanding.

This is not true,

If this isn’t true, than why is there a judgment from the ECHR on this case? Do you have any proof for your claim?

https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"itemid":["001-230854"]}

Good time to become vegan. They can’t be against that!

Of course they can. The following is a AfD request (source: German parliament, auto-translated by DeepL)

AfD demands warning against vegan diet

The AfD parliamentary group is calling for warnings about vegan diets. The Federal Center for Health Education (BZgA) should “explicitly and emphatically warn of the dangers of a vegan diet without the additional intake of supplements, especially for risk groups”, according to a motion (20/9798). The warnings would have to be visible digitally on the website of the Federal Agency. Furthermore, the warnings should be included in corresponding printed materials, including a list of possible symptoms of malnutrition.

(…)

https://www.bundestag.de/presse/hib/kurzmeldungen-984214

They are simply against everything. That’s the way they operate. Their party platform states that they want to remove all subsidies for farmers. At the same time they are protesting that a very small part of those subsidies is being removed. They try sow chaos, hatred and division. An AfD politician even said: “The worse Germany is doing, the better it is for the AfD”

When I hear Nazi, I think “Ah, someone disagreed with an asshole”, and I don’t think “Hitler”.

These are some of people that are currently protesting:

Source for the image is Germany’s protestant church:

https://www.domradio.de/artikel/evangelische-geistliche-rufen-zur-teilnahme-demos-auf

This really is about Nazis and not just about an asshole.