• 4 Posts
  • 51 Comments
Joined 8 months ago
cake
Cake day: February 3rd, 2024

help-circle

  • That’s not true at all. I have Narcissistic Personality Disorder, and I care about others very deeply. And My actions reflect that. For example, recently I shut down a cult discord server run by a pedophile who’s dating kids from the cult. This is because I think adults dating kids is bad.




  • I would rather have left a comment or reported the comment, but I couldn’t because I was banned. I had to escalate My response. My response did not cause LOC to leave the mod team, they were already suffering from burnout and other issues with moderation. The change was already coming, and LOC decided to make it after they misgendered Me. I’ve been in this community since then trying to lower tensions by pointing out that the issue of division with Mindtraveller was solved, and I offered to mod in order to continue to undo the contributions My post made to the drama. I’ve been talking with kittenzrulz over Discord, and they say they have issues with communicating assertively. This has lead some users to feel that this community’s mod team is distant and uncommunicative, and this has lead to paranoia about their intentions. Having spoken with kittenzrulz, I can say that they wish only the best for this community and everyone involved in all this. They’re just nervous about saying the wrong thing and making the problem worse. They want to respect the community’s wishes as best they can. The only problem is that a lot of users want LOC back, and this is impossible because LOC doesn’t want to mod anymore. kittenzrulz doesn’t have LOC’s level of confidence which made a lot of the users here feel at ease.



  • A lot of the regulars here want you to keep on banning and insulting anyone they disagree with. They want fights and they want a divided community. That’s what they’ve always wanted. And LOC banned anyone who didn’t want that, so now most of your regulars are the people who do. You’ve got a community made out of people who want trouble. If you don’t cause trouble for them by banning all dissenters, then they’ll make the trouble for you.

    I think you should go back and do a mass unban of people who were banned for silly reasons. You should try to build community of people who want open and respectful discussion with other leftists, and hope over time those voices drown out the ones spoiling for a fight. I don’t think you’re going to be able to calm down a lot of these people except through the passage of time. They’re probably really distrustful because LOC was so distrustful. They’ll only believe you can do well as a moderator if they see it with their own eyes. They won’t believe anything you say if it’s just words.

    Also, I’m curious. How did you leave things off with Mindtraveller? Were they causing any problems after the change in leadership? Was there any division between them and you?



  • Well, I can’t see Non Voters because it’s banned, but what I can see is that the modlog of Liberty Hub says they were unbanned from here 3 days ago. So if that community was created to attack this one, then it’s clearly been forgiven by Liberty Hub. And c/soulism didn’t have any personal attacks when I visited it. So where’s the division? Who exactly is still fighting this fight other than you and Ada? If Mindtraveller quit fighting Liberty Hub and Liberty Hub quit fighting Mindtraveller, what’s the problem? Why aren’t we all friends? I like Ada, I like kittenzrulz, I like Mindtraveller. It seems like kittenzrulz likes Mindtraveller and I haven’t seen any evidence that Mindtraveller doesn’t like kittenzrulz. They’re saying in this thread that they’re working together. So it seems like all of us are getting along. Who’s still fighting? Ada, apparently, and I don’t know why.

    I didn’t like this community either when LOC misgendered Me. But LOC apologised, I forgave them, and this community even had a change in leadership and resolved not to ban people so often. Now I like this community. Mindtraveller and kittenzrulz are getting along now too. There was a problem, it got fixed, now everyone’s friends. Right?









  • I use capitalised pronouns. I/Me/You/They/Them.

    Weird. I don’t get why that phrase is a problem, but maybe it’s My NPD. Would it sound less pompous if I said “us soulists” instead? Us Australians say “us guys” a lot and it’s part of My instinctive vocabulary, but I don’t like how it sounds grammatically so I changed “us” to “we”. What’s the best way to talk about a group that I’m a member of?


  • Mindtraveller was nothing but supportive of Me the other day when I was being misgendered and grilled on My pronouns by other users. The only other people who were acting like trans allies were yourself and the two mods of this community. And I’m very grateful to you for removing the comments and kittenzrulz for allowing Me to return to this community. But Mindtraveller did something different, which was being deeply vocal about trans inclusivity, and I needed to hear that. It helped Me deal with the anxiety I get when I’m exposed to that sort of thing. Who’s going to yell at transphobes and run c/soulism if they’re gone?

    Also it looks from this thread like the mods of this community are allowing Mindtraveller to be a member, since they have a comment in this thread. They say they’re cooperating with the mods of Liberty Hub and there’s not going to be any more infighting. Where’s the division?


  • I think we’re disagreeing on the definition of a “person”. I’m using the word to refer to a mind and its subjective experiences inside its own head. You’re using the word to refer to a body and other people’s relationships with a mind. It’s internal vs external. As you say, consensus reality is a social construct. If someone is not socially impressionable enough to be taught this construct, then they are not a member of reality. In consensus reality, this shadow-of-a-person, this body, is political. But the actual mind, the inside person, is living in a reality of one, which cannot be political because there are no groups.

    Also I use capitalised pronouns


  • The problem with a social contract is that it’s objective. Everyone has to agree on it and interpret it the same way. Sure, you can bash a Nazi’s face in if the government decides that’s how we deal with Nazis. But what if the government doesn’t? What if we live in a neoliberal capitalist state like our current society? A utilitarian is capable of saying “Fuck the state, I rely on My own moral compass to tell Me what’s right”. We can follow interpretations of ethics that are subjective. We can make our own choices for what we deem acceptable. We can be insurgents. We don’t need to agree with anyone else.