Does it actually tell you the results? I’m curious how they score your driving, and how effective it is. The scariest things I see on the road are things like:
I don’t see how they’d measure how safe a driver you are.
Perhaps it’s just that people are more careful when they know they’re being monitored, and safe drivers are more likely to opt in?
One person has been killed and several others injured
“I was covered in coffee,” Andrew from London tells our colleagues on 5 Live.
It’s a trap.
Sounds like it’s not really a downgrade, but just an unreleased beta or test build? That seems a little less sketchy, and maybe it’ll be generally released at some point.
That’s what I’m talking about though. The stupid changes usually get caught, but you still have someone there who thought it was a good idea.
Something I’ve noticed from working in a big company is that people consistently fail to predict the backlash that their policy changes will cause.
They often don’t even care all that much about the change, and if you point out that people will be upset, they agree that it’s not worth it. They just can’t relate to the people they are impacting.
EVERYTHING THAT MAKES US WHO WE ARE
Lead poisoning. That checks out.
Something which notifies you whenever a new comment or reply is made to a selected post/comment, so that you can keep track of any new conversation.
Something like this would be awesome as a core Lemmy feature IMO. It would essentially turn a post (or maybe any comment tree?) into a matrix style room. Lemmy is actually decent for long term discussion (e.g. helping someone with a problem), but not if there are more than two people involved.
I’d probably:
systemctl suspendWhen the screen fails to wake, are you able to get it back by powering it off, or by unplugging it? Is it X or wayland?
These drugs aren’t giving people the calories they need to live, so it sounds like your business depends on making people unhealthy.
Companies love getting your money early, especially with higher interest rates, so this only makes sense if the prices are going way up.
Oh yeah, that was pretty much the point I was trying to make too.
Of course not, but you have to either trust your users to some extent or give them a system that’s locked down to the point of hindering them.
There’s actually not that much autotools jank, really. There’s configure.ac and a few Makefile.am. The CMakeLists.txt in the root is bigger than any of those files.
There’s also some stuff from autotools archive in m4/. IMO that’s a bad practice and we should instead be referencing them as a build dependencies.
I’m not convinced this backdoor would have been significantly more difficult to hide in the cmake code.
What is ‘unallowed software’? A shell script the user wrote? Something they downloaded and compiled?
Limiting that seems fundamentally at odds with FOSS.
Emacs I assume.
cmake compiles to makefiles as well (it just also supports some other backends). I’m not sure why that matters though. In both cases the makefile is generated.
If you stop shipping autotools generated artefacts in your tarballs, things will be a lot simpler.
Weirdly enough the malicious code does look eerily similar to the benign code, because both are unnecessarily obfuscated.
This is not a human written or readable file you’re talking about. It’s a generated script.
They could have been drinking the same water as the blue team. Disgusting.