• Z3k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I always read this type of statement as man = species.

    I know this particular thinking is falling out of fashion but it’s not totally dead yet

    • Mwalimu@baraza.africa
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Same here. My native langauge is not gendered and I rarely associate “man” in academic spaces with “gender” category. I usually need more info to tilt to gender in discussions.

      • multifariace@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Which is your native language? I keep looking for ways to ungender my english if possible. Removing gender from language feels more honest.

          • multifariace@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Why do I have to know the gender of a person in order to talk about them in third person singular? On more days than not, there is conversation about someone I never met where there is an irrelevant sidebar to clarify gender before communication can continue. I find this relic of the language to be inefficient, pointless and annoying. Daily life would be a lot easier with a non-gendered word for referring to a single person in third person. Languages like Spanish, with gendered nouns, is confusing for even native speakers. I am fascinated by how different languages have different ways of being complicated as well as by their phonology and syntax. I asked my question because I was looking into how other languages use gender and came to the conclusion that none were free from that complication. So I agree with you so far. All languages have gender.