• acastcandream@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      That doesn’t read like paraphrasing Reagan, it read like “compare it to the Berlin Wall.” If that was your goal it was far too opaque, so my not catching it is pretty understandable.

      Hyperbole is valid but it’s also valid to point out when hyperbole is unproductive/so ridiculous it kind of works against the entire point of making the statement. There’s hyperbole that achieves emphasis, and then there’s hyperbole that achieves “this is so patently absurd it makes me disagree with you.”

      • pbjamm@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        It is one of Reagan’s most famous (and lucid) statements. The connection is fairly obvious to anyone familiar with the history.

        • acastcandream@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          You literally didn’t use any of the words he used other than “wall” or reference him at all. Showing the Berlin wall with an Apple logo does nothing to indicate Reagan.

          This is such a ridiculous argument. Feel free to have the last word, I’m done dude.

          • UnbrokenTaco@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            I’m not op but the post was made in the context of the article. The article which had a title modifying this quote about the Berlin Wall “Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!” to refer to Apple’s CEO.

            https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tear_down_this_wall!

            As far as I can tell, the hyperbole was already present before OP shared the image.

            …Or have I misunderstood your point?