• Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I would be cautious of attributing the falling rates of firearms related crimes to the 1996 buyback [source]. It can be argued that the rates were already dropping prior to the 1996 buyback. This can also be further shown in other countries around the world that didn’t enact such laws. For example, all of western Europe has shown declines in homocide rates since the 90s [source]:

    This matches up with Australia [source]:

    And, it matches up with the UK [source]:

    The same goes for the USA, and Canada.

    we very rarely have incidents like mass/school shootings.

    For the sake of clarity, here is a list of all the mass shootings that have happened in Australia – from that list, I count 24 since the firearms buyback in the wake of the Tasmania mass shooting.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      The majority of guns crimes in Canada are committed with guns that were smuggled in from tithe US, where it is (relatively speaking) trivially easy to obtain guns.

      America’s lax attitude towards weapons directly leads to Canada’s gun death problem.

      • Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        America’s lax attitude towards weapons directly leads to Canada’s gun death problem.

        The CBSA should be handling that, though; it’s the CBSA’s job to catch people engaging in illegal border activties, e.g. firearms smuggling (I am assuming that you are insinuating that it is the USA’s job to fix our problem).

        • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          They do catch a lot, but no border control in any non-authoritarian country can catch 100%