A lot of privacy guides suggest avoiding Telegram. I understand that in its default mode there’s no E2EE (and no E2EE for groups at all). If people I know don’t wanttko use Signal, isn’t Telegram the lesser evil given it’s nicer privacy policy (than other popular ones)?

Say I use the FOSS version of it.

    • woobalooba@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think that they published it as a response to the angry users. We wern’t that loud and signal had a reason to do so. That was when they worked on the cryptocurrency and the spam protection. In signals case it dosn’t matter much if the server is compromised since the important part happens on the client side. The server can only forward encrypted salad or not deliver a message. Or log the meta data of the messages. E2e will always be there, despite the server being compromised.

      • ghariksforge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What bothered me was that Signal fanbase was trashing Telegram for not publishing the server source, while Signal was doing this.