no banana @lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 8 months agoI've been wondering for some timelemmy.worldimagemessage-square130fedilinkarrow-up11.57Karrow-down159
arrow-up11.51Karrow-down1imageI've been wondering for some timelemmy.worldno banana @lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 8 months agomessage-square130fedilink
minus-square∟⊔⊤∦∣≶@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down9·8 months agoBecause when that happens, we just find a new rich class, slightly below the ones we just ate. So they go too… now there is a newest rich class, just below the previous. And so on, until you’re the new rich class.
minus-squarebiddy@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·8 months agoBut isn’t that the whole point. The working class becomes the new rich class. That sounds like equal distribution of wealth.
minus-squaremilicent_bystandr@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·8 months agoHmm, sounds like some sort of game theory puzzle now.
Because when that happens, we just find a new rich class, slightly below the ones we just ate. So they go too… now there is a newest rich class, just below the previous.
And so on, until you’re the new rich class.
But isn’t that the whole point. The working class becomes the new rich class. That sounds like equal distribution of wealth.
Hmm, sounds like some sort of game theory puzzle now.