• ArgentRaven@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Speed almost doesn’t matter for me, since Chrome allows ads and Firefox actually lets me use adblockers and privacy badger. The time wasted on ads are way larger than the time spent loading a page.

    • noel_105@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m a Firefox user, but doesn’t Chrome allow adblockers too? Both uBlock Origin and Privacy Badger are supported extensions on Chrome.

        • noel_105@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Thanks for the response and info. Another day where I’m glad to be a FF user.

      • ArgentRaven@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Correct, but Chrome recently allowed ads through that weren’t block-able by uBlock Origin or any other blocker at the time. That’s when I switched back to Firefox, so I don’t know if anyone figured out a way around it.

      • ArgentRaven@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They do, but Google reduced their utility. Ads from YouTube get through my uBlock Origin, and I see ads in my search results. This was a fairly recent development, as maybe a year ago I didn’t see any ads at all on Chrome. The day I got ads punched through my blockers, is the day I quit being lazy and migrated back to Firefox.

        Google has no incentive to block ads when that’s part of their revenue stream, so they nerfed third party extension’s ability to actually work at intended.

  • donut4ever@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Crazy fact. Firefox, for me, has ALWAYS been much faster/stronger on YouTube than any chromium based browser I’ve used. Better than chrome on their own site. This makes it even better. I love this browser.

    • TwinTurbo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      YouTube has been ok for me in Firefox, but other Google apps, in particular Docs/Sheets, always become very laggy after a few minutes. When this happens, it seems to affect the rest of the browser too, so other tabs that I have open slow down as well.

        • henfredemars@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Google intentionally gimps what they serve to their competition to make them look worse. It’s definitely an anticompetitive practice, and they’re walking a fine line about it to not get in legal trouble.

  • trepX@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I use FF to help keep the browser “market” competitive. We don’t want to end up in the same situation as early 2ks where html standardisation was essentially “internet explorer compatibility”, and if you wanted to use newer features as a web dev you had to put multiple implementations, one for IE, and one for the others, as in the browsers actually implementing the specifications correctly. Now MS didn’t exactly do nefarious things with their market power, it was rather neglect, but it damaged the industry nevertheless. For Google, in today’s market, I’d anticipate they would use it to make it very difficult to block ads etc. Internet will become less free.

  • whoami@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    even when chrome was obviously faster, and was gaining in popularity, I still used FF. It’s my preferred browser, and using it along with ublock origin makes going online more hassle free. Add to that multi account containers, reader mode, and just the general ability to customize it, I really can’t see myself using another browser

    • SALT@lemmy.my.idOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Multi account Container is the only thing make me stay also… I can’t live without it, tbh.

    • evan@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Probably desktop. Or desktop and android. Remember that iOS locked down the browser years ago and require any third parties to run on safari’s bones.

      • 1chemistdown@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Chrome and Firefox are building iOS browsers that do not require the apple WebKit. Everyone, including apple, expect apple to drop that requirement soon to help avoid antitrust issues.

        • dan@upvote.au
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          expect apple to drop that requirement soon to help avoid antitrust issues.

          I’m surprised it took this long.

      • DarkThoughts@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Definitely not Android. Firefox is unfortunately quite a bit slower than Chrome based browsers. I still use it as I don’t really do much on my phone, but I hope they can optimize it further.

        • DestroyMegacorps@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I use Firefox on android (specifically fennec f droid) and i use it since ublock origin can be installed and my fennec is hardened too

  • iod@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Firefox in general is faster for me than Chrome in many pages

    However a notable exception are web games and web based game emulators. They’re a lot slower on Firefox and i get horrible sound crackling whereas on Chrome its much better. It’s been like this for years with no seeming improvement.

    • SALT@lemmy.my.idOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Please open bug ticket in Mozilla Bugzilla. It will help the Firefox development further. 🎊

  • Morphior@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have been using Firefox for basically as long as I can remember and I love it. However, there’s one website that I go to Chromium for: GeoGuessr/Google Street View. For some reason it’s unbelievably slow and sluggish in Firefox whereas it works normally in Chromium. Why could this be? To be clear, it’s only the Street View part (and moving/panning/zooming) that’s slow on GeoGuessr.

    • blueson@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It wouldn’t surprise me if the implementation has bias towards Chromium based browsers as both street view and Chromium are from Google.

      • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They were literally caught artificially slowing down page loads and responsiveness on non-chrome browsers a while back.

    • richyawyingtmv@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Forced to with work.

      I utterly hate it. I don’t have it on my personal setup or android mobile - been using Firefox for twenty years now, not gonna stop!

  • EmielBlom@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nice! Although I have been using Firefox for years and never felt there was an issue with speed. Always been reliable for me.

    • Lemminary@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same here. And wasn’t some of that speed difference artificial? Didn’t Google serve their pages slower on FF on purpose for a while? “Do no evil” and all…

  • henfredemars@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Great, now implement modern exploit mitigations and sandboxing like Chrome uses. Firefox is objectively less resistant to exploitation. Some Firefox security has improved since the article was written, such as some sandboxing on Windows, but it’s definitely not as mature.

    I’m not writing that Firefox is insecure. Security is very important to Firefox! However, Chrome has had more work done in the realm of browser hardening.

    • Ace T'Ken@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That is fair, but Chrome is undeniably more open to corporate exploitation. See things like the dramatically reduced utility of ad blockers on Chromium browsers.

      I guess it depends on who you see as the greater threat at present.