• fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    To be clear, I think it’s a great idea for any humans who are capable of doing so to sabotage the ability of a country that doesn’t currently have nuclear weapons to obtain them. The fewer different parties have nuclear weapons, the less likely it is that there will be more nuclear explosions on this planet.

    It would have been better if Israel didn’t have nuclear weapons.

    It would have been better if the Soviet Union didn’t have nuclear weapons.

    • SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ll go way out on a limb here, and say everyone would be better off if literally no one had nukes. Call me crazy, but dying in a nuclear hellfire isn’t exactly how I want to go.

      • fubo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, yes, but that’s not really an option today. Non-proliferation is an option today: preventing the list of nuclear-armed powers from getting any longer.