- cross-posted to:
- workreform@lemmy.world
- news@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- workreform@lemmy.world
- news@lemmy.world
Yeah, no shit.
I am fully aware of this.
deleted by creator
Not just the men, but the women and the children too
Must be all the sand.
You’re all working class!!! If you rely on your work for your living, you’re working class. I get what they mean, but don’t forget that.
The article addresses the fact that it’s a bad definition, but since it is discussing a study they have to work with the definition the study used.
interesting how we are all separated by the color of the collar around our necks.
The yoke around our necks determine our worth.
What if I work in the c suite?
if you’re only 2 pay cheques away from homelessness in the c suite I can perform some very cost effective consultancy work for you.
I’m totally working class but I’ve got a year of float saved up or… Like fifteen days of cancer, so hoping those cells reproduce correctly!
After all there’s more than one way to increase your maximum unemployment time… you make more, lower your living expenses, turn to highway robbery…
…and until it’s bad enough for massive strikes, it will continue.
The left’s job is to make this feeling into “working class men are not okay but now have a functional protest movement seeking to end the wealth gap permanently”.
The problem is Trump is funneling this issue/disenfranchisement towards the aims of the wealthy and those who want to increase the wealth gap permanently.
“Neither Kamala Harris nor Donald Trump has sufficient policy plans to address the interlocking crises of working-class men. On the one hand, you have Trump, who likes to pander to working men but whose policies disproportionately benefit the rich. Then there’s Harris, who appears to have backed away from the ambitious programs of Bidenomics in favor of nibbling at the edges, touting instead a slew of tax credits for “entrepreneurs.””
per the article, it’s not just Trump.