• Soapbox1858@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    16 minutes ago

    Catcher In The Rye

    What a miserable experience reading the whiney thoughts of that little shithead.

    Maybe it would have been more relatable if I read it at 15, but I read it at like 28 and it was insufferable.

    A close second is The Great Gatsby. I kept waiting for something interesting to happen and then just like that it was over.

  • InputZero@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Foundations by Isaac Asimov. It’s a great story but it’s a tough read. Way better as an audiobook.

  • SanguinePar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Of books I’ve completed, Thomas Hardy’s The Mayor of Casterbridge. Read it at school, hated it (as well as Far from the Madding Crowd and Tess of the D’Urbervilles) - full of ridiculous coincidences. And also utterly miserable to boot.

    I started reading The Da Vinci Code, but gave up after the very first page.

  • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I just noped out of a book called “Exquisite Corpse” by Poppy Z. Brite. It’s torture porn with necrophilia and sadism by the ton. It’s actually well written, but I just got sick of it.

    • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I saw it as a play, and it was amazing. Never understood why English teachers have students read plays. The whole point of a play is to have it performed. It’s like trying to teach swimming in an empty pool.

  • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Harry Potter. I tried to read first book but couldn’t, the cringyness was high and the naming convention was straight up from 90’s bad fantasy book parody. It’s like one of the few books i not finished after i started, and i read a lot. And while the others are just forgettable experiences, HP is constantly in my face in media, reminding me of it.

  • funkforager@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Rich dad poor dad. Rich dad never existed. It’s all made up grift and, consequentially, people fall for it and make expensive life investment decisions after it.

  • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    the scarlet letter. I found it extremely unrelatable, and generally boring. I think The Crucible play by the same author conveys the same overarching principles about religious hypocrisy and herd mentality in a much more interesting way.

    • SanguinePar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Possibly showing my ignorance here, but The Crucible is by Arthur Miller, and The Scarlet Letter is by Nathaniel Hawthorne - did either of them write a work with the other title as well? I can’t find anything to suggest they did, but I might be missing something.

    • beliquititious@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I’ve read it twice, and I agree. The plot amounts to spoiled, rich children take their ball and go home because they’re mad the poors won’t let them strip the world of resources for personal gain. The author makes it clear throughout the text that Dagny, Hank, and Galt are the heros for fucking off to larp as robber barons in the 1880’s.

      As a philosophic text objectivism is naive at best and a cynical justification for authoritarianism at its worst.

  • Alice@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    14 hours ago

    When I was a kid I absolutely loved The Chronicles of Narnia and I hated The Last Battle. I thought King Tirian was an unpleasant asshole and I thought killing the Pevensies sucked because they all go to Narnia Heaven forever while Susan has to bury them.

    It probably wasn’t a bad book but it felt like it ended my childhood.

  • Otter@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Charles Dickens wasn’t fun, back when we covered it in school

  • Che Banana@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    15 hours ago

    The grapes of wrath. I hate read that in about 5 days in HSchool and still cannot stand it. The other books we were assigned I enjoyed…but this motherfucker, nope.

    • incogtino@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I thought reading The Grapes of Wrath was like watching Requiem for a Dream - I’m glad I did it once, and I will never do it again

  • JackLSauce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Can’t remember the name but there’s a novel set in Ireland in the not-too-distant future

    Synopsis implied it had become a surveillance state but didn’t gave up before confirming due to the literal writing style

    I swear every sentence was written in the passive voice (poorly remembered examples):

    “It was made known through the clothes he wore they were sent from the department of security”

    “As she walked outside the smell made Spring’s arrival clear”

    Totally fine normally but do it every single sentence and it becomes a mystery novel where the mystery is what the hell you just read!

    … Or idk, Harry Potter 5 is pretty meandering

    • ultranaut@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Are you sure it wasn’t set in Scotland? Charlie Stross wrote a novel a bit like you describe, its in the second person, which is very unusual and definitely rubs some people the wrong way. I think it was Halting State.