• Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    So we’re changing “Sell By” and “Best Before” to "Use By” and "Best if Used By”

    I don’t really see this helping food waste at the consumer end, but greatly benefits supermarkets by allowing products to remain on shelves longer and closer to spoilage.

    However, in that case customers could have less margin to use their purchased groceries before they go bad.

    I think this has a chance to backfire. There is greater incentive to dig around for the product with the most time. Those who frequently shop or most desperate would buy the items expiring sooner, but folks like me who only really check items I’ve been burned on, will start checking everything. I’m not buying a $3.99 head of lettuce with 2 days left.

    EDIT: don’t grocery stores already donate lots of near-expiration unspoiled food to support systems? I thought there was a organization in CA that coordinated all that. They may see a dip in donations.

    • mikezane@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      "It will require the use of “Best if Used By” label to signal peak quality and “Use By” label for product safety,*.

      There will be two dates on products. “best of used by” is what you are used to and when grocery stores will most likely pull the product. “Use by” date will be a second date further out where you might want to actually throw it away.