• Rekall Incorporated@lemm.eeOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Based on historical trends, I would disagree.

    AMD was in a far worse spot with bulldozer and they were able to become competitive again.

    I don’t support Intel (or AMD), if anything I wish there was far more competition in the CPU (x86 or otherwise) and GPU space.

    • pyrflie@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      Really you prefer CPUs that burn themselves out due to software rather than proven hardware. Cool I have a CPU to sell you but it doesn’t match manufacturer spec only manufacturer delivery. They didn’t cover warranty.

      • Rekall Incorporated@lemm.eeOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I am looking at it from a more global perspective; more competition results in better prices and a wider selection of products for consumers. In that sense, we want AMD and Intel to be both competitive and roughly equal.

        I explicitly stated that I would not buy an Intel desktop CPU or an Intel laptop at this point.

        • pyrflie@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Coolo the convo is useless just like intel’s current chip line.