A long form response to the concerns and comments and general principles many people had in the post about authors suing companies creating LLMs.

  • triprotic@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think it’s an interesting topic, thanks for the article.

    It does start to raise some interesting questions, if an author doesn’t want they book to be ingested by a LLM, then what is acceptable? Should all LLMs now be ignorant of that work? What about summaries or reviews of that work?

    What if from a summary of a book an LLM could extrapolate what’s in the book? Or write a similar book to the original, does that become a new work or is it still fall into the issue of copyright?

    I do fear that copyright laws will muddy the waters and slow down the development of LLMs and have a greater impact more than any government standards ever will!

    • baconbrand@beehaw.org
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m all for muddy waters and slow development of LLMs at this juncture. The world is enough of a capitalist horrorshow and so far all this tech provides is a faster way to accelerate the already ridiculously wide class divide. Just my cynical luddite take of the day…