alphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 年前It's routinesh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square27fedilinkarrow-up1847arrow-down113
arrow-up1834arrow-down1imageIt's routinesh.itjust.worksalphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 年前message-square27fedilink
minus-squareMrSnowflake@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up12·1 年前Missed an exclamation mark (as in negation) would be better and happens to anyone.
minus-squareLetterboxPancake@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkDeutscharrow-up1·1 年前Something is either true or false, I would expect to have at least 50% of a chance to get it right on the first try. Nah, I fail to implement it three times because my brain went on vacation without telling me.
Missed an exclamation mark (as in negation) would be better and happens to anyone.
Or using < instead of <= or >
Something is either true or false, I would expect to have at least 50% of a chance to get it right on the first try. Nah, I fail to implement it three times because my brain went on vacation without telling me.