• moon_matter@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Voting with your wallet doesn’t work here. People will choose the most convenient option and the other options will eventually start to disappear. Like safety, this needs to be regulated because security and privacy is by definition inconvenient.

      • UprisingVoltage@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sad but true. For now I encourage everyone to buy second-hand: less waste, less money to greedy corps and more to both the person we buy from and ourselves

      • UprisingVoltage@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, don’t buy smart suff you have no control on would’ve been a better way to phrase it. Ty for explaining it

    • Ronno@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      FTFY: 👏 Do 👏 not 👏 buy 👏 smart 👏 stuff 👏connected 👏to 👏the 👏 internet 👏
      Nothing wrong with wanting smart stuff, as long as it doesn’t send your data. For example, I run all my home automation hardware on a local network that cannot speak to the web, yet I can control everything I want just as the next guy with his fancy Alexa, Google or whatever, but my house doesn’t leak as much data.

      For cars this is still very difficult to do. The only way we can stop sharing as much data would be if we had legislation that would ban this type of information sharing/data mining. In Europe we tried barking, but we didn’t bite. The GDPR is a joke, forcing people to consent to cookies, net result is nothing. They should have banned data mining, fingerprinting and tracking al together, but the tech lobby is way too powerful for that.