• BezzelBob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I remember reading a study done in the late 1990s (I’m pretty sure it was ford) that looked at who was most likely to buy a pickup truck so they could market them better, and they found the people who buy pickup trucks fall into 2 categories, one, a blue collar boss buying it for his employees, or two, an insecure man in his 30s-50s trying to compensate

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      a blue collar boss buying it for his employees

      I assume this means for his business, to be used by employees? I can’t imagine a boss buying his employees a truck.

  • 33550336@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I would not say that we can completely get rid of cars, or that all cars are evil, but such absurdly big, extremely inefficient trucks with negligible visibility just should be taxed to shit.

  • verstra@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    What i don’t understand is how fuel efficiency does not seem to be a concern of an average buyer? It is a large factor for me, and I’m proud to have highly efficient car for its class. Are those large trucks somehow more efficient than older, smaller models? Or are average buyers just not concerned with efficiency?

    Well not everyone has seen the light of factorio, so i might be over-fixating on efficiency.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Oh, they don’t care. Didn’t you know the price of gas is always the fault of the opposing parties last or current elected president??? That’s the AMERICAN way! Blame everybody else, and never accept the consequences for your own actions.

    • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Yeah all the people bitching about gas prices are getting 8-12 mpg in these things, filling a 25 gallon tank once a week. A lot of these folks aren’t exactly rich either and the trucks are expensive. They’re paying a mortgage payment in monthly fuel, insurance, and loan expenses on these things.

      If they could keep their egos in check, they’d save a lot of money.

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        My 91 Cherokee has better mileage than a lot of modern cars, I think the last time I did some basic calculations it came out to about 25 MPG.

    • Kaboom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Full size trucks can get about 22 mpg highway. A 2011 Ford Ranger, the last year they were made, got 19 highway, with the v6…

      They have gotten more fuel efficent.

      • PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Not sure if you’re aware but Ford has resumed production of the Ranger, it’s just now the same size as the Chevy Colorado: huge.

  • Nik282000@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I have one of those 2 seater pickups from 2010. Best vehicle ever, 7-8L/100km and the same size box as the whale behind it.

    • cordlesslamp@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      There’s no way you can get 7-8L/100Km on a pickup in the city. Are you living in the countryside so there’s no traffic?

      • Nik282000@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I have a 30km commute of mostly 50-70km/h roads.

        edit: 7.8L/100km on the last fill

  • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    If you compare the same type of truck instead of comparing a regular cab mid size truck with a full size crew cab truck, you realize that they’re mostly higher than they were before but otherwise their dimensions aren’t that much bigger, especially if you compare with the evolution of car sizes. The mk6 Jetta was a subcompact even though it’s the same size as a mk5 Passat which was a compact.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Regular cab vs crew cab, short box vs long box, mid size vs full size, that’s the same kind of truck for you?

        • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Are there any small trucks available that aren’t crew cabs? I know the maverick didn’t have an option for it last time I looked and that’s everyone always suggests when I bring up that I hate all the available trucks these days. I don’t need to cart around a family of four. I need to haul lumber, tools, and furniture. Give me a single cab with a full bed that isn’t half the size of a school bus. Thanks to the fucking chicken tax and CAFE that’s impossible now.

          • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Extended cab with 6’ box are a thing, regular cabs are available on full size trucks with the same fuel economy.

            • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              It could be 8ft if they ditched the extended cab and I do not want a full size truck. I’m short as fuck and they’re a pain in the ass to get things in and out of and just more of a pain to get around in general. I want a truck like the 1998 Ford Ranger. Unless something like that becomes available I’ll stick to my civic and borrowing my dad’s shitty Colorado when I need a truck.

              • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                The Ranger never had an 8ft bed so I don’t know why an extended cab + 6 ft bed isn’t ok considering that it means you have space to transport stuff outside the elements without needing a storage box inside the bed taking space.

                And worst case, just get an older truck, it’s not as if vehicles just explode after 5 years on the road.

                • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  The Ranger never had an 8ft bed so I don’t know why an extended cab + 6 ft bed isn’t ok

                  I was just pointing out that they could do that and it would be better for me. If you need the stuff you’re hauling to be protected from the elements you can use a bed cover or a tarp. Even with my civic I just put groceries or whatever small stuff in the passenger seat. I have little use for interior space. There have been many occasions using that Colorado where a longer bed would have been great.

                  As far as old trucks go you’d have to go back a lot further than five years to find something that meets the criteria I’m looking for and hope you find one that was actually cared for.