return2ozma@lemmy.worldcake to United States | News & Politics@lemmy.ml · 6 days agoWill the Debate This Week Be ‘Rah-Rah’ or ‘Ruh-Roh?’www.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up127arrow-down11file-text
arrow-up126arrow-down1external-linkWill the Debate This Week Be ‘Rah-Rah’ or ‘Ruh-Roh?’www.nytimes.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.worldcake to United States | News & Politics@lemmy.ml · 6 days agomessage-square12fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareatzanteol@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·edit-26 days agoOr “ho hum.” Who doesn’t know the candidates yet and thinks they’ll learn anything about them?
minus-squareFlaminGoku@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·5 days agoIf it even happens. Trump is looking for every reason to not attend.
minus-squaredelirious_owl@discuss.onlinelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·5 days agoI, for one, haven’t seen a few of the US candidates at a debate.
minus-squareatzanteol@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·5 days agoThere are two candidates. No, the others are not viable. Yes I know that’s unfair. Yes voting for them is basically not voting and potentially helps another candidate you “hate more” to win instead.
minus-squaredelirious_owl@discuss.onlinelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·5 days agoThere are more than 2 candidates.
Or “ho hum.”
Who doesn’t know the candidates yet and thinks they’ll learn anything about them?
If it even happens. Trump is looking for every reason to not attend.
I, for one, haven’t seen a few of the US candidates at a debate.
There are two candidates. No, the others are not viable. Yes I know that’s unfair. Yes voting for them is basically not voting and potentially helps another candidate you “hate more” to win instead.
There are more than 2 candidates.
Good luck with that.