alphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 25 days agoGot no time to codesh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square11fedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down10
arrow-up12arrow-down1imageGot no time to codesh.itjust.worksalphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 25 days agomessage-square11fedilink
minus-squarerockSlayer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·25 days agoI think QA engineering needs to become more widespread. The “extra pair of eyes” can’t compare to a department of people dedicated to code review and testing.
minus-squarejol@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·25 days agoQA and Code reviews do different jobs. Manual and automated testing will not notice your code is shit, so long as all test cases pass.
minus-squareWindex007@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·25 days agoYou don’t want a department that you throw it over the fence to, you want them embedded on your team. Keep those feedback loops TIGHT bois
I think QA engineering needs to become more widespread. The “extra pair of eyes” can’t compare to a department of people dedicated to code review and testing.
QA and Code reviews do different jobs. Manual and automated testing will not notice your code is shit, so long as all test cases pass.
You don’t want a department that you throw it over the fence to, you want them embedded on your team. Keep those feedback loops TIGHT bois