Alt text:

An idling gas engine may be annoyingly loud, but that’s the price you pay for having WAY less torque available at a standstill.

    • iamkindasomeone@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      They still are…cars. We don’t need no more cars on our streets. Yeah, they could help to replace some old combustion cars but they still are worse than public transport and bicycles.

      • hswolf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        I’m all for efficient public transports in downtown, I use them daily myself, but people on suburbs won’t really see a benefit to this.

        On the other hand, just switching to electric is a nice start, otherwise we won’t be able to live much longer.

        • PlexSheep@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          16 days ago

          Especially people in suburbs would benefit from public transport and suburbs built for walk ability and cycling.

          • hswolf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            16 days ago

            That’s the problem, only switching the transportation method isn’t enough, there’s a whole infrastructure behind that needs to be built.

            In most city centers you can kinda refurbish pre-existing systems, but in suburbs you need to build from scratch, and the distances are way bigger which imposes another challenge.

            Don’t get me wrong, im all for it, but we need to acknowledge these problems first.

            • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              16 days ago

              Suburbs are intentionally designed to not be walkable.

              To get to the neighbor behind my house, without cutting anybody’s yard, I have to walk about a mile. We aren’t far. His daughters play with my sons through our shared fence.

              And that’s a modest example. Plenty of cul de sacs that are “close” to the main street, as a crow flies but a lot further if you’re an East Asian Chinchilla Monkey running as fast as you can.

              • person420@lemmynsfw.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                16 days ago

                Love it or hate it, they aren’t intentionally designed not to be walkable, they’re intentionally designed to discourage traffic from driving through them.

                The reason communities like yours and the one behind your house aren’t connected is to reduce the amount of cars driving down your block. To make it safer for your kids to play outside.

                • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  15 days ago

                  The reason communities like yours and the one behind your house aren’t connected is to reduce the amount of cars driving down your block.

                  Which is ironic because it has the opposite effect by forcing every resident to get around via car

            • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              15 days ago

              Yeah, unfortunately the Levitt-town style of suburbs (which are all that’s allowed to be built nowadays) are largely incompatible with public transport. We need to fix zoning laws to allow pre-war style suburbs to be built again to make public transport feasible. And all of this will take awhile to fix