• swim@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    Oh honey, your stealth edit shows that you don’t understand. I’ll explain it to you: the study you keep linking doesn’t differentiate between those foods in that “range of ultra-processed foods (UPF),” so that means data coming from “sugar-sweetened beverages, snacks, confectionery” is getting all mixed in with the data of the “‘plant-sourced’ sausages, nuggets, and burgers,” which unfortunately renders the conclusions of the study rather meaningless when we’re talking about the CVD outcomes of just one of the data sets.

      • swim@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        I just told you why the study you linked is invalid for this conversation. Do you want me to quote the comment you just replied to so you can reread it?

        • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I’m not going to continue providing you with valid studies so you can keep trying to disprove them to promote your agenda.

          Isn’t that sealioning?

          • swim@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Did I ask you to continue providing studies? Agenda? Good luck, friend.