Scholars say the new charges of attempting to overturn the 2020 election pose a unique test for the rule of law and go to the core of the threat to democracy

WP gift article expires in 14 days.

https://archive.ph/zskUQ

    • achsonaja@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      11 months ago

      Same. It’s hard to care about these clickbait titles when nothing has stuck to him or changed his supporter’s opinions.

      • catchy_name@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        We’ve seen his lawyer go to prison before and that pattern may repeat here. We’ll just have to see whether he ends up seeing the inside of a cell along with them.

      • JillyB@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Worse, his poling seems to improve after each indictment. He’s good at spinning them into narratives that gain him support.

      • Pete Hahnloser@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Luckily, voting plays zero role in court cases. Changing the minds of the electorate is never the goal of a criminal case, and as to “nothing has stuck to him” … that’s simply not true. (And even if it were, past performance is not indicative of future results.)