• archonet@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    188
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    9 days ago

    Fetterman really is a mixed bag, and to be honest, I kind of like that. Life should be full of nuanced characters, I shouldn’t have to decide between the same cookie cutter pieces of shit we have every election.

    He’s a piece of shit for supporting Israel so staunchly, don’t get me wrong, but there’s also plenty to like about him.

  • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    87
    ·
    9 days ago

    If anyone cares to read “Project 2025,” it’s a blueprint for creating a Judge Dredd universe, where the only people still living in it will be the Super Rich and the Super F*cking Poor.

    That’s a bad thing, by the way.

    • aodhsishaj@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      79
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      He also shares a very large portion of the core beliefs of the old Republican party. In the 1960s he would’ve likely been considered center right.

      It’s crazy that endorsing medicare and social support structures makes him a Democrat now.

      • Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        8 days ago

        It’s not crazy, it’s intentional. Poor education combined with the lack of social structure creates a voting population ripe with anger over the shitty system and looking to blame someone instead of learn why it’s like that.

        Conservative media is specially made to take uneducated and rage blind voters and churn out Republican candidates who pretty much only hold office because of manufactured spite towards democrats.

        • evranch@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          This is a ridiculous viewpoint, the Democrats are a center right party. Here in Canada they would be considered conservative.

          He supports healthcare and workers’ rights, he’s a Democrat.

          Or at this point the Republicans are so cracked that straight up “if he doesn’t support Project 2025, he’s a Democrat”

          • jj4211@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            He’s referring to:

            The liberal comedian then asked Fetterman whether his shift in various policies had anything to do with his recovery from his 2022 stroke, asking if > his near-death experience had given him a “freedom.”

            “Absolutely,” Fetterman responded. “There’s a line from the first ‘Batman,’ Joker’s like ‘I’ve been dead once already. It’s very liberating.'”

            “It’s freeing in a way. And I just think after beating all of that, I just really [want to] be able to say the things that I have to really believe in and not be > afraid of if there’s any kind of blowback.”

            Notably:

            Some of the most progressive and left parts of the Democratic Party are standing for the kind of side that have kinds of organizations like Hamas

            He basically broadly cast Palestinians as "because Hamas is among them, they earned their situation.

            So nominally Democrat, but he’s been called “Republican’s favorite Democrat” and has been espousing some more right wing sentiment this year particularly.

            • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 days ago

              Brain damage from a stroke is well known to possibly cause major shifts in personality and beliefs too

              Dude went from calling himself a progressive at every opportunity pre-stroke, to going on a rant about why he has no idea why anyone would think he was a progressive and how angry it makes him

              Being confused about things and responding with belligerence is also normal following things like strokes or the normal effects of aging.

              All this shit is logical, except where we pretend they’re normal and the same as elected.

          • pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            No he literally had a stroke, had brain damage, and stopped being a progressive. I’m not talking figuratively here or being like “hurr durr non-progressives are brain damaged”, the stroke figuratively turned him into a different person, he became significantly more conservative.

            Which really is a shitty situation all around, it’s really unfortunate.

          • morbidcactus@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            I don’t pay attention to american individual politicians as much but maybe he’d be a red Tory? Morneau was a grit cabinet minister and he’s solidly centre right, LPC tends to be neolib

  • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 days ago

    It’s a shame he went full Zionist over donor money.

    But Project 2025 is just basic conservatism. It is a wishlist that should shock no one for existing because it’s pretty much verbatim what right wingers have demanded since pretty much ever.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      And it’s not like it’s trump specific.

      They’ve wanted to do this shit longer than even Biden has been alive.

      If trump dropped dead right now, the replacement would do the same stuff. Whatever republican running in 2036 will still want to finish up what hasn’t been done yet.

      trump is a symptom, he might be the symptom that kills us, but just removing trump doesn’t solve the underlying problem.

    • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I’m inclined to think that his brain damage was the root cause (which led to accepting the bribes donations) - the timing was right, and only the brain-damaged would be Zionist at this point.

    • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Just because someone with access to intelligence doesn’t believe that what’s happening in Gaza amounts to genocide does not mean that they are some religious fanatic zionist.

      You realize virtually everyone in Washington agrees with Fetterman about what’s happening in Gaza? You realize most Western democracies, their heads of state, along with their state and national security apparatuses, all agree that there is no genocide happening in Gaza?

      Maybe you simply have the calculus wrong? Have you considered that possibility?

        • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          Everyone who doesn’t agree with me is a paid operative.

          I guess all their heads of state, displomats, intelligence, and national security wonks who disagree with you are also all being paid by some global cabal of Jews that you have imagined.

          Yes, block me, and go further into your echo chamber of self delusion.

      • Snowflake@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 days ago

        Because 40 thousand dead out of a population of millions equates to genocide. The number includes the savage Hamas terrorists you love so much as well. Maybe you just simply don’t understand the calculus or what a genocide truly is. Thank Israel they don’t show you.

        • Bald death tolls say nothing of whether or not something fits the statutory definition of genocide. People die in wars. Innocent people die in wars.

          Hamas started a war on behalf of all these victims that they could not possibly win. The de facto government refuses to surrender or release hostages. They refuse to wear uniforms. They employ child soldiers. They build tunnels under dense population centers to use the population at large as human shields. They refuse to let their own families evacuate. They pay people to die as “martyrs.” That’s why there are 40,000 out of 5,000,000 Palestinians dead, 0.8%.

          That death toll, in these circumstances, is not evidence of genocide, it is actually evidence that Israel is pretty careful and actually not trying to kill civilians. Any other Army in that region of the world would have murdered every man woman and child in Gaza after about the tenth suicide bombing, forty odd years ago. It’s 40,000 out of 5 million in the face of the fact that Israel could easily turn all of Gaza and all of the West Bank into a sheet of glass in three hours, and have not done so. They could have let no food or water into the country, no medicine into the country. But they have not done so. Rather, they have been consistently ramping up their capacity to inspect shipments going into Gaza since the war broke out. They could have not evacuated anyone. They could have not called anyone on the phone, they could have sent zero text messages, instead of the millions and millions of phone calls and texts that they’ve sent. These facts, obviously none of which are reported in the Qatari media you no doubt have been gorging on, fly in the face of your bullshit reasoning.

          • Snowflake@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            Then you have to wonder if the Palestine state will install another government similar to Hamas when Hamas is eradicated. As well it’s not true Hamas started this war on behalf of all the victims because the majority of Palestine voted in Hamas which ran on a destroy Israel agenda. It means the majority of the victims would have supported this war. Was their lives truly that bad if they are able to have and feed millions of children? That they were desperate to start this war? It does not make sense. There are western countries struggling to have more kids than older people and they were thriving.

            • I don’t wonder that. They aren’t able to feed millions and haven’t been since I’ve been alive. The only thing stopping Gaza from a calamitous famine has been and remains western charity. Gaza does not literally have the tools, resources, or skilled people needed to govern itself, or even to physically rebuild itself.

              What I do wonder is, if the people of Gaza had to bear the actual price of its antisemitic terrorism–which has left it completely isolated, except from other far right religious dictatorships–would the people there allow Hamas to exist?

              They only tolerate it, I believe, because they know no hope. It’s been so long since anyone there thrived, the only thing they have to celebrate is death and killing, martyrdom and terrorism. Hopeless as they may be right now, as you pointed out, they are, relatively, fed.

              Ironically it’s in large part the charity that keeps this system in place.